July 3rd, 2009, by marilynstowe 3 Comments »

From the comment pages of The Independent, 03/07/09.
No longer the capital of divorce
By Marilyn Stowe
Yesterday, I thought about placing a bet on the outcome of the Radmacher v Granatino case. I would have backed the outside chance that the Court of Appeal would uphold the pre-nuptial agreement, even with all the odds stacked against me.
English law doesn’t automatically recognise such agreements. It is about needs, obligations and distributing assets and income fairly. Yet, I thought, times have changed. We are living in a European country. English law gives the courts discretion to reinterpret the law. Would the same judges who once pooh-poohed pre-nuptial agreements dare to change their minds? They did. Continue reading >
September 3rd, 2008, by marilynstowe 2 Comments »

If worst comes to worst, make sure you have back-up.
If your intended spouse is a foreign national and you are going to move overseas to be with them, are you aware that if your marriage breaks down, you may be unable to return home to your family with your children?
You could, for example, be held to a pre-nuptial agreement in a foreign language that you did not understand when you trustingly signed it. What if it makes no proper financial provision for you or your children?
You may be submitted to the mercy of a foreign court – a religious court, even. What if it enforces a decision weighted against you, a decision that a court in your home country would not contemplate? At best, your departure would be authorised and you would then have to uproot your children and change their entire way of life.
At worst, that court’s decision could leave you in a terrible situation: legally unable to leave that country with your children. Continue reading »
August 14th, 2008, by marilynstowe 1 Comment »

I was interested to read an excellent article called Pre-nuptial agreements – a rethink required in this month’s Family Law journal. By Christopher Sharp QC of St John’s Chambers in Bristol, it contains an interesting review of the law in that area.
He begins with the famous case of Hyman v Hyman in 1929, where the House of Lords ruled that two parties could not agree to exclude the jurisdiction of the court, a position which remains to this day.
It means that in England and Wales, a prenuptial agreement will not be automatically upheld. Instead, an agreement of this kind is a matter for the court to take into account.
Since then various cases have sounded judicial warning bells, with judges questioning this approach, while informed judicial thinking has no doubt helped to shape the recent reference to the Law Commission who are examining whether a change of law is required to make these types of agreement automatically legally binding.
Mr Sharp canters through current law, including some well known cases such as Crossley v Crossley,(2008) 1FLR1467, where predictably the Court of Appeal indicated it was likely they would uphold the agreement, recognising that each party was in their own right a multi-millionaire, several times married and divorced. As I have previously posted, unfortunately the court only had the opportunity to withness intitiall skirmishes, as Mrs Sangster did not wait for the final ruling before abandoning her challenege.
It is clear that parties to a PNA should not assume they are unlikely to be upheld. To the contrary, it seems clear that PNA’s will be upheld – or at least parts of them -provided they are not unreasonable.
Continue reading »
August 12th, 2008, by marilynstowe 2 Comments »

Parents of prospective brides and grooms are coming to see me in increasing numbers, to ask about prenups.
My opinions on prenuptial agreements are well known. I don’t like them, do not believe that they are “socially necessary” and do not believe that they should be automatically legally binding. I would not have signed one myself – nor married anyone who asked me to as a precondition of marriage.
However, parents of prospective brides and grooms are coming to see me in increasing numbers, to ask about prenups. Many of these parents are wealthy, some are super-wealthy and others are not wealthy at all. What they share are concerns about what will happen if their children’s marriages break down. They don’t want any of their hard-earned cash to pass to the divorcing spouses, and they are determined to protect their money.
It’s understandable. But is it reasonable – or advisable – to expect a future son or daughter-in-law to enter into a prenuptial agreement? I’m not so sure. What is often overlooked is the effect of a prenuptial agreement on the marriage itself. Continue reading »
Recent Comments