The rights of Scottish cohabitees by Jennifer Gallagher

family law

In Scotland, financial provision for cohabitants on separation and death is set out in the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006. This gives cohabitants a certain degree of rights. However, it is unclear whether cohabiting couples in Scotland are better off than their counterparts south of the border.

In July 2007 the Law Commission in England and Wales published recommendations for overhauling cohabitation law in England and Wales. Unfortunately, the government decided not to take suggested reforms forward and in the current climate it seems unlikely that reform will be reconsidered anytime soon. This means that cohabitants in England and Wales remain in what is described as an “unsatisfactory” position and subject to “a patchwork of legal rules” that can lead to uncertainty, injustice, complexity and considerable expense.

The law in Scotland

Scottish law defines ‘cohabitants’ as unmarried couples who live together as if they are husband and wife. There is no qualifying duration of relationship and in deciding if the Act applies the court will consider the length of the relationship, the nature of it and the financial arrangements between the parties.

The Act created two rights – a claim on separation and a claim on death.

A claim upon separation

The Act also allows a claim to be brought for a lump sum on separation and for a claim to be made in respect of the financial burden of looking after a child of the relationship. The law currently only allows the claim to be in the form of a cash lump sum payable in full or in installments. It is possible the Scottish Parliament may review this policy and consider allowing additional ‘payments’, such as property transfer or pension sharing akin to the financial provisions that can be made on divorce.

The Scottish claim process is very similar to what was proposed by the Law Commission south of the border in 2007. The law requires the surviving cohabitant to demonstrate they have been economically disadvantaged and/or that their former partner has been advantaged. Essentially the claimant has to show that they have ended up in a worse position.

A claim upon death

This only applies on intestacy (when someone dies without a will). It allows a surviving cohabitant to claim broadly the same financial provision as a surviving spouse.

It’s worth noting that according to private client lawyers, in many cases the provision a surviving cohabitant settles for actually ends up being less than that of a surviving spouse.

The time limit on the claim is six months from the date of death and where no executor has been appointed in that timeframe there are certain practical issues around raising proceedings to assert the right to claim. The cohabitant can also find his or her claim competing with claims of the deceased’s surviving children and if these children are from a previous relationship of the deceased there is real scope for family strife.

Determining the value of claim

In Gow v Grant the Supreme Court concluded that the legislation should aim at fairness and a general balancing out of the economic impact of the relationship rather than attributing each item of expenditure to one party or the other and seeing who ends up worse off.

Quantifying claims is very difficult. The legislation is an improvement on having no rights at all but in practice it can be challenging to work out what a claim is worth and what the prospects of success might be. Even if you can bring a claim the court hearing the claim has retains discretion to decide what (if anything) should be awarded. The limited nature of this type of order can be a drawback in many cases where the main asset is the family home.

 

Jennifer Gallagher is a Family Law Partner at Scottish law firm Lindsays. Scottish lawShe is accredited as a specialist in family Law and family mediation by the Law Society of Scotland. Jennifer also sits on the committee of the Family Law Association, the professional organisation for family lawyers in Scotland.

 

Photo of Edinburgh by Eduards Ceravs via Flickr under a Creative Commons licence

Stowe Family Law Web Team

View more from this author

1 comment

Andrew - August 14, 2017 at 7:32pm

“The cohabitant can also find his or her claim competing with claims of the deceased’s surviving children and if these children are from a previous relationship of the deceased there is real scope for family strife.”
.
If the children are from the relationship or marriage with the person with whom the deceased built up the assets they ought to come first. The English law of intestacy should be altered in that sense, too.
.
In the case of a claim on separation: What connection with Scotland does the claiming party (pursuer?) have to have – or to assert the defending party (defender?) has to create jurisdiction? Domicile? Residence during the cohabitation? That the cohabitation was in Scotland even though both were habitually resident elsewhere such as England? If both (or either?) were domiciled in Scotland but the cohabitation was in England – e.g. both posted there for a limited time by their employer(s) will that do? If it would I see scope for conflicting claims if the English court decides that a house in England was the property of the man, his name being on the title, while a Scots court declares that the woman should have some of its value!

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply to Andrew Cancel reply