Abducted girls’ passports to be renewed

family law

Three teenage girls who were abducted by their father and taken to Australia can have their passports renewed, the High Court has ruled.

The girls’ parents married in Kenya before moving to England. Their relationship was described in Mr Justice Baker’s judgment as “very on and off”. The mother claimed the father was “controlling and on one occasion physically abusive”, and following their 2002 separation and Islamic divorce the three girls lived with her.

However in 2005 the father claimed his former wife had abused the children and they were placed with him while the matter was investigated. Once this was completed, the mother accepted a police caution. Following the incident, she applied for a residence order to finally settle the question of who the girls would live with.

But before the proceedings could finish, the father took the girls with him to Africa before eventually settling in Australia. When the mother found out about this, she launched an application for their return to England under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. This was ultimately unsuccessful, as the girls told authorities they were happy and settled in Australia.

Last year, the Passport Office contacted the High Court about the father’s application to renew the girls’ passports. He claimed that his daughters planned to visit the UK and would need valid documentation to do so but the mother believed he actually wanted to move them to yet another country.

Mr Justice Baker noted that all three girls have Australian passports “on which, it seems, they are able to travel freely” so preventing a renewal of their British ones would not stop them travelling to another country. If this was truly the mother’s concern “she must apply to the Australian court” he said. He therefore ruled that the British passports could be renewed but not until April. This would give her time to make such an application should she choose to do so. After this time had expired, all restrictions on the renewals would be lifted.

The Judge believed this decision was “consistent with the duty of this court to take measures necessary for the protection of children”.

Read SU & SA (Children) here.

Photo by Chris Fleming via Flickr under a Creative Commons licence.

Stowe Family Law Web Team

View more from this author

3 comments

Andrew - March 16, 2017 at 2:09pm

She accepted a caution.
_
He took them lawfully to Australia.
_
An application under the Hague Convention failed.
_
So why are you saying they were “abducted?”

Stowe Family Law - March 16, 2017 at 3:00pm

That is how the action was described in the judgment.

Andrew - March 17, 2017 at 6:54pm

Sorry; I read the judgment on my phone and missed it. Still an odd choice of verb. The sooner these girls are de-warded the better.
_
I’m also concerned that the judge said there was an “Islamic divorce”. If the event took place in England, no there wasn’t. There was a purported divorce, a non-divorce, a meaningless ceremony (see section 44, an I err not, of the Family Law Act 1986) and it would have been better to ignore it in the judgment. It irks me like social workers who say there was a “cultural marriage”.

Leave a comment