Call us: Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm, Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm
Call local rate 0330 056 3171
Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm | Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm
Call local rate 0330 056 3171
Mon - Fri 8:30am - 7pm | Sat - Sun 9am - 5pm

Child of unidentified parents to be adopted

Recent Posts

Family Court Fees to Rise

March 28, 2024

Related Posts

Family Court Fees to Rise

March 28, 2024

A child whose parents could not be found should be adopted, the High Court has ruled.

The young girl, temporarily named ‘Jade’, was referred to West Sussex County Council by a woman who claimed the child’s mother had died. Using information from this woman, the local authority identified a man who was thought to be the girl’s father but they found no biological link between them.

Jade’s exact age is not known, but a paediatrician who treated her said she was probably born in September 2014.

When no further information on the identity of her parents could be found, the council applied for care and placement orders to give Jade a permanent adoptive home.

At the High Court in London, Mr Justice Hayden said the local authority had “taken every conceivable measure to achieve the identification of the parents”. The council had “gone well beyond [reasonable steps] and explored creative and well considered options” to find them but had had no success.

They also launched a publicity campaign in the hope that someone would come forward with accurate information. Jade was described as “an affectionate, sociable, bright and happy toddler” who liked singing and dancing. She was “inquisitive, active and enjoys the outdoors” where she can climb and explore. Her photograph was circulated by the BBC, ITV and both the paper and online versions of the Daily Mail. Unfortunately the campaign failed.

As a result, the judge declared there was “no reasonable prospect of identifying her two parents”. Therefore, it was in Jade’s best interests to have “a smooth and structured move to a loving permanent placement”.

Luckily, the local authority claimed “a prospective adoptive placement [had] already been identified” with a suitable family, so Mr Justice Hayden made the requested care and placement orders.

Read the full judgment here.

The blog team at Stowe is a group of writers based across our family law offices who share their advice on the wellbeing and emotional aspects of divorce or separation from personal experience. As well as pieces from our family law solicitors, guest contributors also regularly contribute to share their knowledge.

Contact us

As the UK's largest family law firm we understand that every case is personal.

Leave a comment

Help & advice categories

Subscribe
?
Get
more
advice
Close

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up for advice on divorce and relationships from our lawyers, divorce coaches and relationship experts.

What type of information are you looking for?


Privacy Policy
Close
Close