Japan to sign Hague child abduction treaty
Japanese Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida has announced plans to sign the Hague Convention on Child Abduction.
More formally known as the ‘Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction’, this international treaty provides a legal mechanism for the return of children abducted by a parent from one participating country into another. To date, 89 countries have signed the Convention.
Speaking at a news conference in Washington with US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Kishida said:
“The government [of Japan] is intending to go through the necessary procedures for the early signing of the treaty. We will make our best efforts so that the early ratification of the convention will be achieved.”
Clinton said she hoped the National Diet (Japanese parliament) would ratify the treaty during its next session, set to begin later this month.
Japanese courts have traditionally been unsympathetic to foreign partners of Japanese women, almost never granting custody or access to their children. There has also been little legal recourse available if Japanese women return to the country with their children after the end of a relationship. According to a report in The Japan Times, at least 120 US parents have filed cases with the Japanese courts but all have been unsuccessful.
The US Congress pressed the previous Japanese government for action but it was slow to respond and suggested any ratification of the Hague Convention could only apply to future cases.
Fumio Kishida is a member of the Japanese Liberal Democratic Party, under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
Photo by Héctor de Pereda via Flickr under a Creative Commons licence
|
Share this post
|
Get free family law updates
|
Marilyn Stowe’s new book: expert advice on all aspects of divorce, for just 99p!
Divorce & Splitting Up by Marilyn Stowe is the essential how-to book for anyone who is getting divorced or splitting up from a partner. Read more >>
"A must buy that really opens your eyes to what is involved if you are considering or going through a divorce." - Amanda Brown
"This will answer your questions in a way that non-lawyers can understand." - Miss P.
"This really has helped me to see that there is light at the end of the tunnel and I will come out of it a stronger person." - J
Awards
IAML
1 Comment
Patrick on January 21, 2013 at 8:33 pm
They are already backtracking on this… http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20130119b5.html
MoFA likely made the statement on the Hague to bargin with the Department of State on getting public support for their dispute with China of the islands. Now that Japan got the US statement, they will continue to drag their feet on the Hague and any real solution to the common Japanese practice of Parental abduction.
Japan has repeatedly stated that they would sign the Hague… it has never happened. In addition, the Hague is NOT retroactive. So it will not address any of the existing cases of abducted American/UK/Canadian/etc. children. Unless Japan updates its domestic family law – to provide for joint parenting (they ONLY have sole-custody) and ENFORCEABLE visitation – the signing of the Hague treaty will be largely meaningless.
As it stands, Japan is ALREADY a signatory to the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child (UNCRC), which ALREADY has provisions both against parental abduction and providing for the right of children to know both parents. However, Japan has been ignoring that treaty since they ratified it in 1994.