<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pre-nuptial agreements and English law: what happens now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marilynstowe.co.uk/2009/07/03/england-divorce-capital-radmacher-granatino/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marilynstowe.co.uk/2009/07/03/england-divorce-capital-radmacher-granatino/</link>
	<description>Where Family Law Meets Family Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 21:43:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;German ordered to repay house deposit to his in-laws after divorce&#8221; &#124; Marilyn Stowe Family Law and Divorce Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marilynstowe.co.uk/2009/07/03/england-divorce-capital-radmacher-granatino/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;German ordered to repay house deposit to his in-laws after divorce&#8221; &#124; Marilyn Stowe Family Law and Divorce Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marilynstowe.co.uk/?p=925#comment-347</guid>
		<description>[...] I believe, has been prompted &#8211; at least in part &#8211; by last year&#8217;s ruling in the Radmacher v Granatino case, which involved an agreement made between a German heiress and her banker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I believe, has been prompted &#8211; at least in part &#8211; by last year&#8217;s ruling in the Radmacher v Granatino case, which involved an agreement made between a German heiress and her banker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prenuptial agreements and the High Holy Days: food for thought &#124; Marilyn Stowe Family Law and Divorce Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marilynstowe.co.uk/2009/07/03/england-divorce-capital-radmacher-granatino/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Prenuptial agreements and the High Holy Days: food for thought &#124; Marilyn Stowe Family Law and Divorce Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marilynstowe.co.uk/?p=925#comment-346</guid>
		<description>[...] persuaded the Court of Appeal to uphold the entirely one-sided prenuptial agreement in the Radmacher v Granatino case. Katrin Radmacher has managed to hold her entire £100million fortune intact after an eight [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] persuaded the Court of Appeal to uphold the entirely one-sided prenuptial agreement in the Radmacher v Granatino case. Katrin Radmacher has managed to hold her entire £100million fortune intact after an eight [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An English Family Lawyer in Chicago &#124; Marilyn Stowe Family Law and Divorce Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.marilynstowe.co.uk/2009/07/03/england-divorce-capital-radmacher-granatino/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>An English Family Lawyer in Chicago &#124; Marilyn Stowe Family Law and Divorce Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marilynstowe.co.uk/?p=925#comment-345</guid>
		<description>[...] approach that a US lawyer should take, if a client had ended up living in England. I discussed the Radmacher v Granatino case and the principle of comity with other countries. My advice? Our courts clearly wish to act in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] approach that a US lawyer should take, if a client had ended up living in England. I discussed the Radmacher v Granatino case and the principle of comity with other countries. My advice? Our courts clearly wish to act in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

