From the comment pages of The Independent, 03/07/09.
No longer the capital of divorce
By Marilyn Stowe
Yesterday, I thought about placing a bet on the outcome of the Radmacher v Granatino case. I would have backed the outside chance that the Court of Appeal would uphold the pre-nuptial agreement, even with all the odds stacked against me.
English law doesn’t automatically recognise such agreements. It is about needs, obligations and distributing assets and income fairly. Yet, I thought, times have changed. We are living in a European country. English law gives the courts discretion to reinterpret the law. Would the same judges who once pooh-poohed pre-nuptial agreements dare to change their minds? They did. Continue reading >
Related Posts
Here is a list of other related blog posts that you may be interested in:
- Beware a divorce hangover from post-nuptial agreements
- An English Family Lawyer in Chicago
- Prenuptial agreements and the High Holy Days: food for thought
- Family Lore Podcast
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
September 4th, 2009 at 5:26 pm
[...] approach that a US lawyer should take, if a client had ended up living in England. I discussed the Radmacher v Granatino case and the principle of comity with other countries. My advice? Our courts clearly wish to act in [...]
September 30th, 2009 at 12:21 pm
[...] persuaded the Court of Appeal to uphold the entirely one-sided prenuptial agreement in the Radmacher v Granatino case. Katrin Radmacher has managed to hold her entire £100million fortune intact after an eight [...]